People make videos by their digital cameras or mobile phone cameras, copy it somewhere else and remove from the device. However that data can be recovered.

When they sell that particular device, the hardware geeks i.e. the people who work in selling these devices, they run different recovery methods and recover the deleted media from that device and then use it for blackmailing or upload on internet.

So, the best advice for all is to never sell their cameras, mobile phones, hard drives etc.

We had come to know some very serious cases which make me to right this post to keep you aware of certain facts.

When we make our personal families and friends videos and misuse it, it can be the cause of someone death.

Making videos and uploading it to face book and YouTube is very easy now…

sometime when you keep your video inside mobile phone and its stolen from you are one of your friend transfer the data from your mobile to some other device it can bring fetal results.

Let me share a very tragic story with you.

A very tragic story of this girl in the below video. She was killed by her brothers in swat when they saw that movie on you tube and mobile phone. This dance was organized in their friends wedding where someone make that movie from mobile and launch on you tube and because of this her brother killed her by Kalashnikov fire. It was ladies program. She was innocent having just enjoys in her friends wedding.i personally visited this place where this tragic incident take place.

People make videos by their digital cameras or mobile phone cameras, copy it somewhere else and remove from the device. However that data can be recovered.

When they sell that particular device, the hardware geeks i.e. the people who work in selling these devices, they run different recovery methods and recover the deleted media from that device and then use it for blackmailing or upload on internet.

So, the best advice for all is to never sell their cameras, mobile phones, hard drives etc and do not put your personal videos and pictures in mobile phone and request all friends that please do not upload videos without permission

Most people have a working understanding of the fact that Apple lost the PC wars to Microsoft, and only nominally understand that when Apple created the iPod and then the iPhone, the company started to go in a new direction. And anyone who’s gone into an Apple store knows full well that Apple’s customer service and stores represent the gold standard for selling and supporting tech gadgets. But beyond that, the reasons why Apple is really successful are still a mystery to many.

There are plenty of books about Apple that talk about everything from Steve Jobs’ history to tenets of Apple’s business models to secrets about Apple’s internal-management ideas. However, after years of watching Apple up close and personal and having to deal with every one of their CEOs, as well as interacting with various Apple execs over the years, I would like to suggest that the reasons the company is successful can be boiled down to six key principles that make it very hard for competitors to compete with Apple.

1. For any product that Apple creates, the people who create it have to want it themselves
So many times with projects I do with other tech companies, the goal is almost always based around the technology first, followed by whether or not people really want to use it. Geeky engineers are dazzled by the technology at their disposal and often create something because they can. But Apple’s approach is quite different. The engineers who are creating Apple products actually make them for themselves. And Jobs was the chief “user” of Apple products when he was alive. All of Apple’s products are based on the fact that Jobs represented the real customer. And his engineers had to come to grips with that when designing a product. It has to be something that they personally couldn’t live without.

2. The products have to be easy to use
Jobs was a stickler on this point. While industrial design is a critical component of any product Apple makes, if it is not easy to use, it is considered worthless to the consumer. This is what drove the company’s user-interface designs from Day 1 and is still the mantra pushed to the software and hardware engineers every day they go to work. All of the products they create have to be intuitive and easy to understand and learn. As technology has become more intricate and users want more features, the task of keeping things simple is sometimes difficult. And Apple creates tools for power users and rookies, which can mean a broad range of ease-of-use issues. But even with that, Apple is the only company I deal with where ease of use is more important than the product itself. Apple makes this a critical goal of its approach to creating anything for the market.

3. Keep things simple
I was in Paris in the past two weeks and had talks with various French telecommunications officials about many mobile-computing issues. But one conversation I had in particular emphasizes this keep-it-simple point. We were discussing how to compete with Apple — a major pastime for all Apple competitors and carriers these days — when the question of why Apple is really successful came up. And one exec nailed it when he said he felt that the real reason Apple is successful is because it has one product; in this case the iPhone. It minimizes the decisionmaking process for the consumer by making things simple. The person speaking was with a carrier in France, and he said that in their stores, they have to have as many as 25 different models of phones available. That makes it hard for his staff to be really knowledgeable about all of them all of the time, and their customers just have too many options to choose from.

But Apple only has one iPhone model, and anyone who has gone into an Apple store understands that every staff member there knows a great deal about each of the four major products carried in its stores. Apple doesn’t have five iPhone models to choose from; it has only one. While this may seem limiting given the amount of smart phones available to users, the truth is the reverse. Our company has done consumer research for over 30 years, and consumers constantly tell us that while choice is nice, in reality they want the process of choosing a tech product to be simple and not complicated by a plethora of choices.

Yes, there are tech-savvy people who like more choices and sometimes even like complexity, but from years of experience as a market researcher, I can tell you that in the end, the majority of users are not tech-savvy, and keeping things simple for them is a plus. Apple understands this in spades and is never tempted to add multiple versions of an iPhone, iPad or even more than one or two types of iPods. This makes buying an Apple product simple. And consumers seem to appreciate this considering the huge number of iDevices that are sold each year. I know the tech media and techies are the most vocal about this issue of choice, but in the end, while choice is good for competitive pricing, what nontechie consumers really want is simplicity.

4. Offer great customer service and in-store experiences
Jobs understood one of the major conundrums of technology: even if you create products that are easy to use, the variety of things that people want to use technology for often creates complexity. Because of this, consumers at all levels may need some hand holding from time to time. I was one of the most vocal critics of Apple when it introduced its first retail store in Tokyo in 2002. I thought it was crazy for Apple to try and go into retail. At the time, and even today, tech retail stores are in decline while big-box stores like Costco and Walmart sell products on price and nothing else. I thought that if price were the issue, an upscale retail store would be DOA. Wow, were other naysayers and I wrong about Apple’s retail strategy.

Apple uses this conundrum to its advantage. Because it keeps product SKUs simple, the salespeople inside the stores know the products really well. Notice that when you go into an Apple store and are greeted by one of the sales staff, you’re not asked, “How can I help you?” Instead they ask, “What would you like to do today?” They go right to the heart of any technology user’s question, a question that’s always related to what they want to do with the technology the user is interested in.

And once you explain your needs, they take care of it on the spot in most cases. Or if you need more hand holding, they turn you over to the Apple Geniuses. No wonder 50% of people buying Apple products are new to Apple. Apple’s products are simple to understand and use, but if you do have a problem, Apple can take care of it at their stores or over the phone quickly.

Besides having geniuses in design, software and retail, Apple also has the cash to invent components, manufacturing processes and things like that, which almost makes it impossible for the competition to make any real headway against Apple. And don’t let the fact that Android has become the No. 1 smart-phone operating system make you think that it’s the big winner. Yes, Android has gained ground by the sheer numbers of companies and products pushing Android. But the real measure of success is in the profits, and Apple is making as much as 70% of all the profits in smart phones and about 85% of the profits in tablets. Just ask any Android competitor which they would like more, market share or profits. You’ll get the answer relating to the real measure of success in this market.

These six principles may seem a bit simplistic given the fact that Apple also has great software, industrial design and a powerful ecosystem of content, apps and services as part of the company’s success equation. However, I can tell you that from my three decades of following Apple, it’s these six key principles that are what really makes it successful. And as long as it adheres to them, it’s pretty likely that Apple will continue to grow and command a relatively large share of the market in the company’s product categories where it competes.

The thread claimed the snake was one of two enormous boas found by workers clearing forest for a new road. They apparently woke up the sleeping snakes during attempts to bulldoze a huge mound of earth. This is Biggest snake in the world!!

“On the third dig, the operator found there was blood amongst the soil, and with a further dig, a dying snake appeared,” said the post.

“By the time the workers came back, the wounded boa had died, while the other snake had disappeared. The bulldozer operator was so sick that he couldn’t even stand up.”

The post claimed that the digger driver was so traumatised that he suffered a heart attack on his way to hospital and later died.

The dead snake was 55ft (16.7m) long, weighed 300kg and was estimated to be 140 years old, according to the post. Biggest snake in the world

Goldvish “Le million” is designed by renowned designer Emmanuel Gueit, who designed lots of luxury watches and jewelry.

It’s said that the GoldVish “Le million” is priced at € 1 million; GoldVish Luxury Communications will open its first stores in Geneva, Switzerland, for sale GoldVish’s cell phone products.

Because of the declining survival rate of panda cubs, someone came up with a plan of combining genes of panda and sheep to create “Panda Sheep.” After a few years, researchers finally completed the gene transplantation and created this odd species.

But the company’s growth rate, though still staggering, continues to slow. Facebook’s monthly active user count — the number of users that engage with the site at least once a month — grew by 33% in the first quarter over the first quarter of 2011. A year ago, the network was growing at a 58% annual clip, and in the first quarter of 2010, that number was more than doubling.

Facebook also noted last month that it believes approximately 5% of those users are fake.

Still, for a company approaching 1 billion active users, a 33% growth rate is nothing short of impressive and is likely to fuel more interest in the company. Facebook’s eagerly awaited initial public stock offering is scheduled for May.

Facebook said that it earned $205 million in the first quarter on $1.1 billion in sales. Both revenue and profit fell from the fourth quarter of 2011, which Facebook chalked up to typical advertising sales slowness in the first quarter compared to the fourth.

“We believe that this seasonality in advertising spending affects our quarterly results,” the company said in the filing.

Though sales grew by 45% over the first quarter of 2011, net income was also down 12% from the first quarter.

Meanwhile, the company’s closely-watched cash hoard remained virtually unchanged in the first three months of the year from the $3.9 billion it registered in the prior quarter. That’s despite adding 339 employees last quarter, growing its headcount by 11% — growth that it said it anticipates sustaining “for the foreseeable future.”

The company said it forecasts capital expenditures of up to $1.8 billion in 2012.

Facebook went on a spending spree in April. Earlier Monday, Facebook announced it had purchased a portion of a large patent portfolio for $550 million that Microsoft had previously bought from AOL

It is also forking over $300 million in cash as well as $700 million more in stock to purchase mobile photo sharing startup Instagram. The 23 million shares it plans to give to Instagram appears to value the company atabout $75 billion.

Facebook’s stock is expected to begin trading sometime in mid-May. By then, most analysts estimate Facebook’s valuation will fall somewhere between $85 billion to $100 billion.